Research shows that low frequency sound, such as noise produced by offshore 
activities, 
causes lesions in the sensory organs of squid, octopus and cuttlefish

Noise pollution in the oceans has been shown to cause physical and behavioral 
changes in marine life, especially in dolphins and whales, which rely on sound 
for daily activities. However, low frequency sound produced by large scale, 
offshore activities is also suspected to have the capacity to cause harm to 
other marine life as well. Giant squid, for example, were found along the 
shores of Asturias, Spain in 2001 and 2003 following the use of airguns by 
offshore vessels and examinations eliminated all known causes of lesions in 
these species, suggesting that the squid deaths could be related to excessive 
sound exposure.   

Michel André, Technical University of Catalonia in Barcelona, and colleagues 
examined the effects of low frequency sound exposure-similar to what the giant 
squid would have experienced in Asturias-in four cephalopod species. As 
reported in an article published in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 
(e-View), a journal of the Ecological Society of America, all of the exposed 
squid, octopus and cuttlefish exhibited massive acoustic trauma in the form of 
severe lesions in their auditory structures.

The researchers exposed 87 individual cephalopods-specifically, Loligo 
vulgaris, Sepia officinalis, Octopus vulgaris and Illex coindeti-to short 
sweeps of relatively low intensity, low frequency sound between 50 and 400 
Hertz (Hz) and examined their statocysts. Statocysts are fluid-filled, 
balloon-like structures that help these invertebrates maintain balance and 
position-similar to the vestibular system of mammals. The scientists' results 
confirmed that statocysts indeed play a role in perceiving low frequency sound 
in cephalopods.

André and colleagues also found that, immediately following exposure to low 
frequency sound, the cephalopods showed hair cell damage within the statocysts. 
Over time, nerve fibers became swollen and, eventually, large holes 
appeared-these lesions became gradually more pronounced in individuals that 
were examined several hours after exposure. In other words, damage to the 
cephalopods' auditory systems emerged immediately following exposure to short, 
low intensity sweeps of low frequency sound. All of the individuals exposed to 
the sound showed evidence of acoustic trauma, compared with unexposed 
individuals that did not show any damage.

"If the relatively low intensity, short exposure used in our study can cause 
such severe acoustic trauma, then the impact of continuous, high intensity 
noise pollution in the oceans could be considerable," said André. "For example, 
we can predict that, since the statocyst is responsible for balance and spatial 
orientation, noise-induced damage to this structure would likely affect the 
cephalopod's ability to hunt, evade predators and even reproduce; in other 
words, this would not be compatible with life."

The effect of noise pollution on marine life varies according to the proximity 
of the animal to the activity and the intensity and frequency of the sound. 
However, with the increase in offshore drilling, cargo ship transportation, 
excavation and other large-scale, offshore activities, it is becoming more 
likely that these activities will overlap with migratory routes and areas 
frequented by marine life.

"We know that noise pollution in the oceans has a significant impact on 
dolphins and whales because of the vital use of acoustic information of these 
species," said André, "but this is the first study indicating a severe impact 
on invertebrates, an extended group of marine species that are not known to 
rely on sound for living. It left us with several questions: Is noise pollution 
capable of impacting the entire web of ocean life? What other effects is noise 
having on marine life, beyond damage to auditory reception systems? And just 
how widespread and invasive is sound pollution in the marine environment?"

Press release is available at 
http://www.esa.org/pao/newsroom/press2011/04112011.php 

Reply via email to