Apologies for cross-posting. This is the final call for papers for a
session at the 2014 Association of American Geographers meeting in Tampa,
FL. Please note the November 4, 2013 deadline for abstracts.

*Economies of Death: Economic logics of killable life and grievable death

*Organizers:
Patricia Lopez (Geography, University of Washington)
Kathryn Gillespie (Geography, University of Washington)

Specialty Group Sponsorships: PGSG, GPOW

How and why are certain lives and bodies made killable and certain deaths
made grievable? What does a close analysis of death in various contexts
uncover about political economic processes and the violence or erasures
involved in these social relations? What can particular case studies of
death in the framework of grievability and killability contribute to a
theory of economies of death? This paper session is interested in taking
"economies of death" beyond death studies as encompassed by hospice care,
tissues economies, organ markets, and bereavement, toward a broader
conceptualization of how the valuations of bodies and places are written
through an economic logic. How does this economic logic make certain lives
and deaths matter more than others? How can conversations across
sub-disciplines within geography and beyond illuminate insights that
respond to these kinds of questions?

Judith Butler's work aims to disentangle "what counts as a livable life and
a grievable death" (2004, xv) in relation to American foreign policy as she
asks us to think about the way different lives are valued or devalued.
Donna Haraway observes that certain lives (animal lives, in particular) are
'made killable' by their positioning in social hierarchies of dominance
(e.g., Haraway 2007). In this vein, we start with the premise that
grievability and killability are governed closely by the economic logics
that work to obscure important moral frameworks and ethical social
relations.  As geographers, we are in a unique position to uncover the
nuanced ways in which these processes of making grievable and killable are
repetitive and knowable, even as they are particular in their
contextualization. In this, we seek papers that explore the possible
pathways opened by thinking through economies of death, beyond legally
codified relations and political ends into a social ontology that
"demand[s] and enable[s] response, not bare calculation or ranking"
(Haraway 2009, 116). Thus, we are also interested in exploring a moral
framework that confronts the hierarchy of lives and deaths and its
embeddedness within political economic processes of production,
consumption, extraction, foreign policy, etc.

We hope to bring together a wide range of case studies in this session to
give a more grounded theory of economies of death uncovering how this
theory does not exist in isolation - that it might be taken up, applied,
and grounded across multiple boundaries (of location, 'race,' class,
gender, species). By framing this session around such varied case studies,
we are seeking to open up a conversation between sub-disciplines within
geography (and beyond) to examine the ways that localized economies of
death show a specificity that is politically and ethically engaged. And
while we don't want to lose the specificity of a close analysis of one
place or entity, we do want to engage in a knowledge-making practice and
the construction of a theoretical framework that can be taken up and
understood in more varied contexts.

Topics may include (but are certainly not limited to):

路       The commodification of the body over the lifecourse - how this
varies depending on 'race,' class, gender, location, species;

路       The politics of incarceration and capital punishment;

路       Transitional spaces of living and dying (e.g., immigration
processing and detention centers, livestock auction yards, and refugee and
IDP camps)

路       Technologies employed in spaces of war, occupation, and sanction
which operate to calculate approximations of a perceived balance between
'common good' and 'necessary evil' (i.e., 'collateral damage')

路       The commodification of life which lends itself to such enactments
(and subsequent erasures) of human and animal slavery, the slaughtering and
rendering of animal bodies, the disappearances of women across the globe,
etc.;

路       The death of ecological landscapes through processes of natural
resource extraction and climate change;

路       The differential practices of the disposal of dead bodies - both
animal and human;

路       The representation and sensationalization of death and (some) dead
bodies in art, literature, and popular media (to include movies, social
media, news, etc.)


Abstract submissions: Please email abstracts of no more than 250 words to
Patricia Lopez ([email protected]) and Kathryn Gillespie ([email protected])
by November
4, 2013.


-- 
Kathryn Gillespie
PhD Candidate
Department of Geography
University of Washington
[email protected]

Reply via email to