Am Dienstag, 7. November 2006 23:18 schrieb Andrew Lunn: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 06:47:11PM +0100, Manfred Gruber wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 7. November 2006 18:29 schrieb Andrew Lunn: > > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 06:19:17PM +0100, Manfred Gruber wrote: > > > > Hi ! > > > > > > > > I have 2 flash chips on redboot: > > > > RAM: 0x00000000-0x02000000, [0x000439c8-0x01fdd000] available > > > > FLASH: 0xf0000000 - 0xf1ffffff 256 x 0x20000 blocks > > > > FLASH: 0xf2000000 - 0xf3ffffff 256 x 0x20000 blocks > > > > > > > > Is there is now a solution to concate two flashes? > > > > > > In this case yes. The two flashes are contiguous. So you don't need to > > > use the flash_v2 branch. You just need to configure the v1 driver so > > > that it knows there are two flash chips in sequence and it will appear > > > as just one block. > > > > Hi Andrew ! > > > > The Problem is that for other boards where i have 16/32/64/128 MB Flash > > types on 32 Bit Databus flash_v2 is very fine, and helped me a lot to > > save some time to always make different bootloaders. So I want or have to > > be flash_v2, on flash_v2 is no easy solution to bring the config to the > > secund chip ? > > The v2 driver should also be able to do multiple contiguous chips. Or > just use the v1 driver with the v2 infrastructure. > hi Andrew !
thanks for your help. concate of two flashes works now, i dont have tested if it all works when there is a image or kernel on both flashes splited but i will do it when i have more time and i think there should not be a big problem because of mmu-mapping them contiguous. thanks a lot, greetings from tyrol, regards manfred -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss