On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:39:08 -0600 Tyler Hicks <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am puzzled by the current ecryptfs maintenance situation. > > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/768122 > > The torch has been passed to me. :) yup, thanks. > > I queued this for 2.6.30. It could be bumped up for 2.6.29 (and even > > backported to 2.6.28 and earlier) with suitable acks from the > > maintainer(?) > > > > The changes to ecryptfs_rmdir() are valid, but not the rest of the patch. > OK, I'll drop my copy. Please send something back at me sometime, with indications about which kernel version(s) it should be merged into. We should chase J.R. for a Signed-off-by:, which was omitted from the original patch. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
