Andrew Morton: > > + atomic_inc_return(&lower_dentry->d_inode->i_count); > > + atomic_inc_return(&lower_inode->i_count); > > atomic_inc() would suffice here, yes?
I thought that ..._return() is smp safe and necessary here. Because lower_inode may be touched by lower fs (outside of ecryptfs). Anyway my original patch seemed to be already dropped. J. R. Okajima _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
