+1 from me; due to the lack of interest in ecs2 and the inactivity in general I don't know that it's necessary to keep it around at all.

-stephan

Henri Yandell wrote:

ECS is largely quite simple with regards to its repository structure;
the only issue to figure out is the unreleased jakarta-ecs2 version.

It seems to me we should:

move jakarta-ecs to:

jakarta/
   ecs/
       tags/
       branches/
       trunk/       (jakarta-ecs HEAD)

and then optionally keep the jakarta-ecs2 module as
jakarta/ecs/branches/ecs2 or jakarta/ecs/newversion or something.

Any +1's/-1's for the general approach, and any ideas on the ecs2 handling?

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to