+1 just for neatness i'd be inclined to keep it around in branches/ecs2.
- robert On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 02:55, snagy wrote: > +1 from me; due to the lack of interest in ecs2 and the inactivity in > general I don't know that it's necessary to keep it around at all. > > -stephan > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > >ECS is largely quite simple with regards to its repository structure; > >the only issue to figure out is the unreleased jakarta-ecs2 version. > > > >It seems to me we should: > > > >move jakarta-ecs to: > > > >jakarta/ > > ecs/ > > tags/ > > branches/ > > trunk/ (jakarta-ecs HEAD) > > > >and then optionally keep the jakarta-ecs2 module as > >jakarta/ecs/branches/ecs2 or jakarta/ecs/newversion or something. > > > >Any +1's/-1's for the general approach, and any ideas on the ecs2 handling? > > > >Hen > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
