On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 08:16 -0700, Chris Myers wrote: > This might be a repeat (as it looked like the last email bounced) but... > > I was interested in adding/updating the support for Voice XML, and it > looked like 2.0 might be a better match architecturally for what I was > looking to do. > > I was wondering if anyone was working on this code, and if not, if anyone > would mind if I took up an effort to finish it.
go right ahead :-) - robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
