APERAK; although it is less precise than the 997 and each case of using
APERAK must be evaluated in terms of what the recipient trading party
needs to send back to the originating TP in the way of a message
acknowledgement
Cheers
Bob Carper
Whitehead, Anthony wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I am having a temporary loss of memory! What is the EDIFACT equivalent of
> an ANSI 997?
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Whitehead
> EC/EDI Project Manager
> Seeburger, Inc.
> www.seeburger.com
> Phone: (678) 966-9345
> Fax: (770) 409-0002
>
> =======================================================================
> To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
