Jim Divoky wrote:
"...The only advantage it offers currently over traditional EDI methods
is in the fact it can ease visual presentation..."
The word "can" is
particularly important here. XML syntax makes absolutely no guarantees of
readability. A straight conversion of EDI to XML could (another important
word) use the element IDs as the tags, in which case we might see something
like
<BGN><353>02</353><127>5551212</127><373>19990101</373><127>BR549</127><768>ZZ</768></BGN>
Granted, as he
also pointed out, there are few if any agreed-upon standards so there's no
saying the above is better or worse or recommended or likely to be used
(probably not as shown, but I wanted to provide an extreme case). At least
it's well-formed. 8-)
Best
regards,
Bill Chessman,
SMTS
Peregrine
Systems, Inc.
E-markets
Group
|
- Application-level trading partner integration jwells123
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Dave Taylor
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Matthew Montano
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Jim Divoky
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Hurd, Richard A (Richard)
- Re: Application-level trading partner i... Jim Divoky
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Bill Chessman
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Mark Kusiak
- Re: Application-level trading partner i... Brian Richardson
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Bob Scheuermann
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Rachel Foerster
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Rachel Foerster
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Lee LoFrisco
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Mark Kusiak
- Re: Application-level trading partner i... Dave Taylor
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Leah Closson
- Re: Application-level trading partner integ... Hurd, Richard A (Richard)