On Sep 25, 2008, at 6:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You can know if you're certifiable and not have to pay for that
> knowledge. However defining who / what is certifiable earns lots of
> money for many people in many industries, why should EDI be any
> different?
Because since EDI's beginning (a long time ago) applications did not
need a 3rd party certification. The market was self regulated thanks
to public feedback via user groups and public forums. So why should
the EDI/B2B market suddenly require certification from a commercial
3rd party? As I see it the only reason is for a certain 3rd part to
expand its market since the current market no longer provides new
clients and the current client base does not provide enough income.
For me that is not a good enough reason. If users believe that there
is a need for certification why not create with the help of the
solution providers a free opens source test suite?
Klaus
------------------------------------
...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>,
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
