Thanks for your advice. DRL
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Mike Rawlins <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > > > It would be advisable to hide the X12 part. I believe the UN/EDIFACT > standards bear no such restrictions so long as you include the UN/CEFACT > copyright notice. > > However, it's only marginally useful as it is without segment or data > element names, descriptions, semantic notes, purpose and scope of the > transaction set, code lists, code list references, etc. You are also > missing the syntax notes (or X12 relational conditions). > > And, for EDI purists you should probably call it "Data Element" and not > "Field". Data element numbers would also be useful. > > Mike > > > ----------------------------------------- > Michael C. Rawlins, Senior Software Engineer, GXS > Sent from personal account > > On 3/8/2012 9:53 PM, dreamriverland dreamriverland wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > > > The link is here : http://www.dreamriverland.com/ > > > > I think it will infringe their copyright. So I will hide the part of the > > X12 part. The site will only show the EDIFACT part, but development for > > X12 will continue underground. LOL. > > > > DRL > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Mike Rawlins > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> ** > > >> > >> > >> Please re-post the link. Is this a viewer of the grammar or of an > >> instance of an X12 transaction (the actual data)? > >> > >> If it's of the grammar, i.e. the metadata for the standard, you're > >> probably infringing on copyright since it would be a derivative work. > >> However, if I remember correctly you obtain certain rights by buying the > >> X12 table data (not cheap). Other types of rights come with buying hard > >> or soft copies of the published standards. Still other rights come from > >> being an ASC X12 member. I advise checking with DISA for specifics. DISA > >> has in the past few years gone after some of the more flagrant copyright > >> violators. > >> > >> Mike > >> (long time ASC X12 geek) > >> > >> ----------------------------------------- > >> Michael C. Rawlins, Senior Software Engineer, GXS > >> Sent from personal account > >> > >> > >> On 3/8/2012 4:23 AM, Jim Qiu wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Thank you. > >>> > >>> Is there a person from DISA to make a about if this is a infringement > to > >>> its copyright? > >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Leah Halpin<[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Also, you might run into copyright issues, DISA does tend to keep a > >> pretty > >>> tight rein on this info, which really is theirs. > >>> > >>> Leah > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: Ken Etter<[email protected]> > >>> > >>> To: Chris Johnson<[email protected]>; " > [email protected] > >> "< > >>> [email protected]> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 2:13 PM > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Re: A simple EDI grammar structure tool self > >>> recommending. > >>> > >>> > >>> In addition to Chris's comments, you have to provide proof that your > >>> 'product' is either new processes and/or original works. The problem I > >>> think you're going to run into is proving this is really that much > >>> different than what is already available from one of the ANSI or > EDIFACT > >>> governing boards OR that your underlying 'code' is all that unique. > >>> > >>> Your best bet is to contact a Patent attorney to start... I sent you a > >>> link to the USPTO site separately... > >>> > >>> Ken Etter > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: Chris Johnson<[email protected]> > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 5:21 AM > >>> Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Re: A simple EDI grammar structure tool self > >>> recommending. > >>> > >>> > >>> Quoted text is from > >>> <CAG6YBzL2ZdsAr=RG07j7=dp8uoi=art2lji-btm-qxqdddt...@mail.gmail.com>, > by > >>> dreamriverland dreamriverland<[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> Can I apply a patent for such a tool in US and how ? > >>> I very much doubt it. There are many products and websites which allow > >>> you to select a directory and then drill down through the hierarchy. > >>> Your site was neater than most but I saw no original approach which > >>> might be patentable. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Chris > >> > >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > ... > > Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject > prefix:<SALES>,<JOBS>,<LIST>,<TECH>,<MISC>,<EVENT>,<OFF-TOPIC> > > > > Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for > work:<JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
