If the data is going to be imported directly into their Inventory system, then the descriptions are useless.
They are only useful if someone is going to compare the description with the part number and be able to detect a difference. > I'm would like to get the groups opinion on inclusion of description > fields. I recently created a 944 (warehouse stock transfer receipt > advice) specification and I included the line item descriptions. My > trading partner resisted, and felt they were not needed since we > passing the part number ID. I like to include them as sort of a > double check in any issues arise with the part number. My trading > partner felt we could save the extra VAN cost if we did not include > them and that they were unnecessary. Whats the groups take on > descriptions? Earl Wertheimer [email protected] http://www.spe-edi.com ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
