I actually sent a patch for Arm some time ago: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2016-August/000489.html
Thanks Michael On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote: > I don't remember seeing any discussion regarding > DISABLE_NEW_DEPRECATED_INTERFACES on the list, so I am a bit surprised > seeing these bugs being filed and assigned. > > Before making any such changes, I would like a strong commitment from > other package owners that deprecating an interface brings along with > it the responsibility to update all existing callers, otherwise > setting this define will only result in more breakage, and ARM has > seen its share of inadvertent breakage in the past when changes to > core code were made without taking other architectures into account. > > > > On 21 October 2016 at 02:21, <bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.tianocore.org> > wrote: > > https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164 > > > > yonghong....@intel.com changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------------- > > Priority|Lowest |Normal > > Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED > > Assignee|michael.d.kin...@intel.com | > ard.biesheu...@linaro.org > > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > > Release(s) the| |EDK II Trunk > > issues must be| | > > fixed| | > > > > --- Comment #1 from yonghong....@intel.com --- > > Assign to Package owner. > > > > -- > > You are receiving this mail because: > > You are the assignee for the bug. > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel > _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
