Hi Hao,
czw., 1 lis 2018 o 08:06 Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com> napisał(a):
>
> Hi Marcin,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marcin Wojtas [mailto:m...@semihalf.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 9:25 PM
> > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Tian, Feng; Kinney, Michael D; Gao, Liming; leif.lindh...@linaro.org;
> > Wu,
> > Hao A; ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; nad...@marvell.com;
> > m...@semihalf.com; j...@semihalf.com; t...@semihalf.com
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add UhsSignaling
> > to SdMmcOverride protocol
> >
> > From: Tomasz Michalec <t...@semihalf.com>
> >
> > Some SD Host Controlers use different values in Host Control 2 Register
> > to select UHS Mode. This patch adds a new UhsSignaling type routine to
> > the NotifyPhase of the SdMmcOverride protocol.
> >
> > UHS signaling configuration is moved to a common, default routine
> > (SdMmcHcUhsSignaling), which is called when SdMmcOverride does not
> > cover this functionality.
> >
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <m...@semihalf.com>
> > ---
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h | 50 +++++++
> > MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h | 2 +
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c | 153
> > ++++++++++++--------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdDevice.c | 37 +++--
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.c | 69 +++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h
> > b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h
> > index e389d52..a03160d 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h
> > @@ -63,6 +63,39 @@ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF
> > ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
> > #define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_VER 0xFE
> >
> > //
> > +// SD Host Controler bits to HOST_CTRL2 register
> > +//
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_MASK 0x0007
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_SDR12 0x0000
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_SDR25 0x0001
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_SDR50 0x0002
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_SDR104 0x0003
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_DDR50 0x0004
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_DDR52 0x0004
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_SDR50 0x0002
>
> I think SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_SDR50 is not needed here.
>
> Since according to the SD Physical Layer Simplified Specification, max clock
> frequency for SD bus mode SDR50 is 100MHz. And there is no eMMC bus mode whose
> max clock frequency is at 100MHz in Embedded Multi-Media Card Electrical
> Standard (5.1).
Ok, will drop it.
>
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_SDR25 0x0001
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_SDR12 0x0000
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_HS200 0x0003
> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_HS400 0x0005
>
> How about the below renames & reorder?
>
> SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_LEGACY 0x0000
> SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_HS_SDR 0x0001
> SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_HS_DDR 0x0004
> SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_HS200 0x0003
> SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_HS400 0x0005
Ok.
>
> > +
> > +//
> > +// Timing modes for uhs
> > +//
> > +typedef enum {
> > + SdMmcUhsSdr12,
> > + SdMmcUhsSdr25,
> > + SdMmcUhsSdr50,
> > + SdMmcUhsSdr104,
> > + SdMmcUhsDdr50,
> > + SdMmcMmcDdr52,
> > + SdMmcMmcSdr50,
> > + SdMmcMmcSdr25,
> > + SdMmcMmcSdr12,
> > + SdMmcMmcHs200,
> > + SdMmcMmcHs400,
> > +} SD_MMC_UHS_TIMING;
>
> Suggest a similar drop of 'SdMmcMmcSdr50' and rename according to the above
> comments upon HOST_CTRL2 register value definitions. Also, how about a rename
> for enum to SD_MMC_BUS_MODE?
Ok.
>
> > +
> > +//
> > // The transfer modes supported by SD Host Controller
> > // Simplified Spec 3.0 Table 1-2
> > //
> > @@ -508,4 +541,21 @@ SdMmcHcInitTimeoutCtrl (
> > IN UINT8 Slot
> > );
> >
> > +/**
> > + Set SD Host Controler control 2 registry according to selected speed.
> > +
> > + @param[in] PciIo The PCI IO protocol instance.
> > + @param[in] Slot The slot number of the SD card to send the
> > command to.
> > + @param[in] Timing The timing to select.
> > +
> > + @retval EFI_SUCCESS The timing is set successfully.
> > + @retval Others The timing isn't set successfully.
> > +**/
> > +EFI_STATUS
> > +SdMmcHcUhsSignaling (
> > + IN EFI_PCI_IO_PROTOCOL *PciIo,
> > + IN UINT8 Slot,
> > + IN SD_MMC_UHS_TIMING Timing
> > + );
> > +
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h
> > b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h
> > index 178945f..25db98a 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #ifndef __SD_MMC_OVERRIDE_H__
> > #define __SD_MMC_OVERRIDE_H__
> >
> > +#include <Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h>
>
> Please do not expose a module private header file here.
>
> One approach comes to me is to keep the SD/MMC bus mode enumeration structure
> in this protocol header file. SdMmcPciHcDxe driver and producers of the
> Override protocol keep a version of the HOST_CTRL2 register value macros of
> their own.
Agree. I will move necessary defines to
Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h instead of exposing SdMmcPciHci.h.
HOST_CTRL2 contents will be a local define in producer code.
>
> > #include <Protocol/SdMmcPassThru.h>
> >
> > #define EDKII_SD_MMC_OVERRIDE_PROTOCOL_GUID \
> > @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ typedef enum {
> > EdkiiSdMmcResetPost,
> > EdkiiSdMmcInitHostPre,
> > EdkiiSdMmcInitHostPost,
> > + EdkiiSdMmcUhsSignaling,
> > } EDKII_SD_MMC_PHASE_TYPE;
> >
> > /**
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> > b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> > index c5fd214..05bd4a0 100755
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> > @@ -740,10 +740,13 @@ EmmcSwitchToHighSpeed (
> > IN UINT8 BusWidth
> > )
> > {
> > - EFI_STATUS Status;
> > - UINT8 HsTiming;
> > - UINT8 HostCtrl1;
> > - UINT8 HostCtrl2;
> > + EFI_STATUS Status;
> > + UINT8 HsTiming;
> > + UINT8 HostCtrl1;
> > + SD_MMC_UHS_TIMING Timing;
> > + SD_MMC_HC_PRIVATE_DATA *Private;
> > +
> > + Private = SD_MMC_HC_PRIVATE_FROM_THIS (PassThru);
> >
> > Status = EmmcSwitchBusWidth (PciIo, PassThru, Slot, Rca, IsDdr,
> > BusWidth);
> > if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > @@ -758,27 +761,37 @@ EmmcSwitchToHighSpeed (
> > return Status;
> > }
> >
> > - //
> > - // Clean UHS Mode Select field of Host Control 2 reigster before update
> > - //
> > - HostCtrl2 = (UINT8)~0x7;
> > - Status = SdMmcHcAndMmio (PciIo, Slot, SD_MMC_HC_HOST_CTRL2,
> > sizeof (HostCtrl2), &HostCtrl2);
> > - if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > - return Status;
> > - }
> > - //
> > - // Set UHS Mode Select field of Host Control 2 reigster to SDR12/25/50
> > - //
> > if (IsDdr) {
> > - HostCtrl2 = BIT2;
> > + Timing = SdMmcMmcDdr52;
> > } else if (ClockFreq == 52) {
> > - HostCtrl2 = BIT0;
> > + Timing = SdMmcMmcSdr50;
> > + } else if (ClockFreq == 26) {
> > + Timing = SdMmcMmcSdr25;
> > } else {
> > - HostCtrl2 = 0;
> > + Timing = SdMmcMmcSdr12;
> > }
>
> As mentioned above, "SdMmcMmcSdr50" can be dropped here.
> And considering the rename above, how about:
>
> if (IsDdr) {
> Timing = SdMmcMmcHsDdr;
> } else if (ClockFreq == 52) {
> Timing = SdMmcMmcHsSdr;
> } else {
> Timing = SdMmcMmcLegacy;
> }
Ok.
>
> > - Status = SdMmcHcOrMmio (PciIo, Slot, SD_MMC_HC_HOST_CTRL2, sizeof
> > (HostCtrl2), &HostCtrl2);
> > - if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > - return Status;
> > +
> > + if (mOverride != NULL && mOverride->NotifyPhase != NULL) {
> > + Status = mOverride->NotifyPhase (
> > + Private->ControllerHandle,
> > + Slot,
> > + EdkiiSdMmcUhsSignaling,
> > + &Timing
> > + );
> > + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > + DEBUG ((
> > + DEBUG_ERROR,
> > + "%a: SD/MMC uhs signaling notifier callback failed - %r\n",
> > + __FUNCTION__,
> > + Status
> > + ));
> > + return Status;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + Status = SdMmcHcUhsSignaling (PciIo, Slot, Timing);
> > + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > + return Status;
> > + }
> > }
>
> I have concern for this, current existing hook points for the NotifyPhase()
> service are performing additional operations during the controller
> initialization process.
>
> Producer of the override protocol can simply return EFI_SUCCESS, if there is
> nothing to do for a specific hook point.
>
> But this hook here is to override the behavior when setting the "UHS Mode
> Select" field of Host Control 2 Register. If the override protocol producer
> does not want to override the behavior at the 'EdkiiSdMmcUhsSignaling' hook,
> but has to do something in other hooks, one cannot directly return EFI_SUCCESS
> for the 'EdkiiSdMmcUhsSignaling' hook. For this case, one has to implement the
> 'EdkiiSdMmcUhsSignaling' hook even if the behavior will be exactly the same as
> the SdMmcPciHcDxe driver.
I see your point. It's not additional code, but replacing the default.
IMO the easiest way to handle it is to go back to a separate
UhsSignaling callback, so that it's either omitted or explicitly
defined by Override protocol producer driver. What do you think?
Best regards,
Marcin
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
