This looks great.

I'm going to dig in a bit and see if we can export discussions for logging purposes or if they are locked into Github.

git clone git://tianocore.discussion ? :)

On 11/16/2018 11:55 AM, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
Hi Stephano,

GitHub supports discussions for teams.

If we added a new team to the GitHub TianoCore
organization for all developers that want to be
involved in community topics and design discussions
(which should closely match the current members of
edk2-devel) then that may be a simple option that
uses services that already there.

Another option is to use discussions for one of the
exiting teams (e.g. Tianocore Maintainers) and make
posts for these discussion topics public.

https://blog.github.com/2017-11-20-introducing-team-discussions/

https://help.github.com/articles/about-team-discussions/

Best regards,

Mike




-----Original Message-----
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org]
On Behalf Of stephano
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 11:14 AM
To: Zimmer, Vincent <vincent.zim...@intel.com>; edk2-
de...@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration
Software

The only reason I didn't include Slack is that it will
only log so much
information before things start falling off into the
ether.

Does anyone in the community currently use Slack and know
of an easy way
of archiving conversations publicly?


On 11/16/2018 9:56 AM, Zimmer, Vincent wrote:
https://slack.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-
boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Kevin D Davis
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 9:35 AM
To: stephano <stephano.cet...@linux.intel.com>; edk2-
de...@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration
Software






        If we get to vote, I’d vote against Google
Groups.  Their interface is very geared toward their
internal work flow and seems to change on a whim.
Thanks,Kevin





On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:08 AM -0600, "stephano"
<stephano.cet...@linux.intel.com> wrote:










We are looking to augment our current communication
methods (mailing list / IRC) with a modern solution for
group collaboration. The goal is to allow folks to
communicate effectively without interrupting the current
patch review system, as well as enabling any future
systems with more robust options.

Specific features we are looking for include
attachments (currently blocked by the list), robust
logging, modern chat, and integration with tools like bug
trackers and source repositories (APIs, or better yet,
pre-rolled plugins).

Our current contenders are Google Groups and Groups.io.
This RFC is in hopes of finding other options to
evaluate.

Cheers,
Stephano
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel





_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to