On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 15:40, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
>
> On 12/10/18 09:36, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> > Could anyone remind me why we have OpensslLib and OpensslLibCrypto?
> > Since these are static libraries, only the referenced objects should
> > be included in the final module anyway, so OpensslLibCrypto seems
> > redundant to me.
>
> please see commit 823005621ef4 ("CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: introduce
> OpensslLibCrypto instance", 2017-02-25).
>Right, fair enough. > >> Namely, please *prepend* a patch to the series that simply deletes the > >> "[Components.IA32, Components.X64]" line, bringing all these drivers to > >> ARM/AARCH64, in the NetworkPkg.dsc build. Once we validate the new patch > >> separately (simply by test-building it), then the current patch can > >> simply replace the component list with the !include directive -- and > >> such a replacement won't incur arch-specific changes. > >> > > > > Ack > > Liming and I strongly disagreed on this point, and I yielded. Please see > the sub-thread that ended with the following comment: > > e790855d-2cd9-1820-7187-0ec1dc52dabc@redhat.com">http://mid.mail-archive.com/e790855d-2cd9-1820-7187-0ec1dc52dabc@redhat.com > > (Alternative link: > <https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-November/032949.html>.) > As long as we end up with a NetworkPkg.dsc that covers everything for all arches, I'm fine with whichever order we apply the changes. _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
