> >> This is my idea to avoid the duplicated mail. I also include Ard and 
> >> Laszlo to
> collect the feedback on how to handle the partial update in the patchset.
> >>
> >
> > Laszlo may disagree with me, but I think that it is not always
> > necessary to resend the entire series when only a single patch
> > changes. It does depend on the situation, though: if it is a trivial
> > patch in a more complicated series then it might make little sense. In
> > other case, just resending the whole thing is probably better.
> 
> I think resending one patch can be acceptable, but the subject line
> (patch nr) and the threading have to be correct. Also, I don't think
> this approach scales beyond exactly one patch-update; it's easy to lose
> track of version numbers etc. So "use sparingly" I guess? :)
> 

Thanks all of your comments, to avoid the missing version track, I have resent 
the whole patch to version 3:).

Best Regard!
Jiaxin


_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to