On 01/24/19 10:31, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 01:48 +0000, Ni, Ray wrote: >> David, >> I think we got an agreement here to move CSM components in OvmfPkg. >> I prefer we firstly clone the required CSM components in OvmfPkg right no. >> Finally I can remove the IntelFrameworkModulePkg/IntelFrameworkPkg in one >> patch. >> (I say "finally" because OVMF CSM dependency is not the only case that >> prevent removing >> the two framework packages.) >> >> Would you like to do the clone? Or if you are busy, I can do that. > > I keep asking this question, I don't believe I've seen an > answer. Apologies if I've missed it.
I think you haven't. And, I'm curious too. :) Thanks Laszlo > Is this code genuinely not going to continue to exist anywhere else in > the Intel ecosystem, any more? > > No TianoCore-based images from this point forth are ever going to even > have the option of supporting CSM? > > Unless some third party also chooses to fork the CSM support code and > keep it on for themselves? > _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
