On Feb 1, 2013 Jordan Justen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Olivier Martin <olivier.mar...@arm.com> > wrote: > > Linaro maintains their own git-svn service: > > http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=mirror/edk2/edk2.git;a=summary > > Andrew, > > While I agree with you that git-svn is a great thing for working with > svn, here is another example of how git-svn is so close, yet so far... > > It looks as though they are using an independent git-svn mirror. > > Thus their r14118 is not the same as our mirror's r14118: > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/c9e8881516a1a09a5f4b19d459710286524bcda8 > http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=mirror/edk2/edk2.git;a=commit;h=51b74ef3738e7f33b4f93878a3b40cab9254230c
Yup, we know about that and it is a problem. We're going to respin the Linaro UEFI tree to use the same git-svn mirror.... My assumption was that this is the tree to use: http://tianocore.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=tianocore/edk2;a=summary Is that correct? It appears to have the same base as the github tree you quoted above. > This mismatch generally makes sharing changes/trees more difficult, > and thus is a point in favor of git vs. git-svn. s/more difficult/impossible/ The git mirrors become basically read-only w.r.t. the mainline tree. You cannot apply anything to the git tree and do a round trip out to the mainline svn tree. It needs to be respun to bring anything back in. g. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
