On 02/09/14 16:42, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 09/02/14 15:41, Reza Jelveh wrote: > > I just noticed that my email had an empty body. > > > > Can anyone comment on how we could get this into the codebase? > > > > > > 0011-OvmfPkg-add-a-HfsPlus-driver.patch > > This code is GPL / CDDL dual-licensed. You're trying to add it to OvmfPkg. > > See OvmfPkg/Contributions.txt (recently updated on Aug 25): > > 5. It is preferred that contributions are submitted using the same > copyright license as the base project. When that is not possible, > then contributions using the following licenses can be accepted: > * BSD (2-clause): http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause > * BSD (3-clause): http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause > * MIT: http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT > * Python-2.0: http://opensource.org/licenses/Python-2.0 > * Zlib: http://opensource.org/licenses/Zlib > > Contributions of code put into the public domain can also be > accepted. > > Contributions using other licenses might be accepted, but further > review will be required. > > GPL is known not to be accepted. I guess CDDL needs review by a lawyer > and/or a high ranking official from Intel. See eg. the R-b on SVN r15892: > > > Reviewed-by: Mark Doran <[email protected]>
Known not to be accepted in Ovmf or are you saying that the code is unlikely to get into edk at all unless I or someone else rewrites it from scratch? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
