On 02/09/14 17:38, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Are you asking if this code would be acceptable in another *Pkg/ > directory, distinct from OvmfPkg/? > > In that case, you'd still have to comply with *that* package's > "Contributions.txt" and "License.txt". And they all look like OvmfPkg's. > > (Except maybe Fat*Pkg's, but that one not only allows redistributors to > curtail the end-user's rights, it *requires* them to do so.)
Yes, that is exactly what I was asking. Feng was suggesting a filesystems pkg. Could we just make a Filesystem package with a more liberal license and move fatpkg under the same banner? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
