duncan ... glad you mentioned that ... and, i too got a little huffy when i read this ... after all, it is a public site ... freely available to all ... and, the stuff on this page about the 3 "papers" in PCPro (by the way ... i did a good search and could not find anything about this publication specifically) ...

so, i was ready to reply like you but, did a bit of web surfing on copyright law ... here is an interesting site geared to multimedia

http://www.timestream.com/stuff/neatstuff/mmlaw.html

i note what was said about "fair use" and, it seems not simply to be that you use a small snippet out of a much larger piece ... see below
===========

You don't need a license to use a copyrighted work in three circumstances: (1) if your use is fair use; (2) if the work you use is in the public domain; or (3) if the material you use is factual or an idea.
Fair Use
You don't need a license to use a copyrighted work if your use is "fair use." Unfortunately, it is difficult to tell whether a particular use of a work is fair or unfair. Determinations are made on a case-by-case basis by considering four factors:
Factor #1: Purpose and character of use. The courts are most likely to find fair use where the use is for noncommercial purposes, such as a book review.
Factor #2: Nature of the copyrighted work. The courts are most likely to find fair use where the copied work is a factual work rather than a creative one.
Factor #3: Amount and substantiality of the portion used. The courts are most likely to find fair use where what is used is a tiny amount of the protected work. If what is used is small in amount but substantial in terms of importance - the heart of the copied work - a finding of fair use is unlikely.

(It is true that de minimis copying (copying a small amount) is not copyright infringement. Unfortunately, it is rarely possible to tell where de minimis copying ends and copyright infringement begins. There are no "bright line" rules.
Copying a small amount of a copyrighted work is infringement if what is copied is a qualitatively substantial portion of the copied work. In one case, a magazine article that used 300 words from a 200,000-word autobiography written by President Gerald Ford was found to infringe the copyright on the autobiography. Even though the copied material was only a small part of the autobiography, the copied portions were among the most powerful passages in the autobiography. Copying any part of a copyrighted work is risky. If what you copy is truly a tiny and nonmemorable part of the work, you may get away with it (the work's owner may not be able to tell that your work incorporates an excerpt from the owner's work). However, you run the risk of having to defend your use in expensive litigation. If you are copying, it is better to get a permission or a license (unless fair use applies). You cannot escape liability for infringement by showing how much of the protected work you did not take. )

Factor #4: Effect on the potential market for or value of the protected work. The courts are most likely to find fair use where the new work is not a substitute for the copyrighted work.
If your multimedia work serves traditional "fair use" purposes - criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research - you have a better chance of falling within the bounds of fair use than you do if your work is a sold to the public for entertainment purposes and for commercial gain.
 

At 04:01 PM 1/28/01 +0000, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

Finally, that copyright notice, which I quote here *without
authorization*:

"All content is Copyright Woodleyside IT Ltd © 2000 unless otherwise
stated. Unauthorised copying, reproduction, emailing, quoting is
strictly forbidden. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more
information."

What nonsense.  Short quotes from published articles are "fair use".
He has no authority to forbid me to quote that material. 

Duncan Murdoch



=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

_________________________________________________________
dennis roberts, educational psychology, penn state university
208 cedar, AC 8148632401, mailto:dmr@psu.edu
http://roberts.ed.psu.edu/users/droberts/drober~1.htm İİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİ'structions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ İİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİ=

Reply via email to