At 01:49 PM 11/19/01 -0500, Wuensch, Karl L wrote:
>         Callender and Osburn (Educational and Psychological Measurement,
>1977, 37, 819-825) developed a method for estimating maximized lambda4, the
>greatest split-half reliability coefficient among all possible split halves
>for a scale.  The method is quite tedious to do by hand, and the authors
>provided a FORTRAN program for accomplishing it.  Not having a FORTRAN
>compiler, I'm considering writing an SAS program (IML) to do this, but don't
>want to waste my time reinventing the wheel if someone else has already
>written an SAS or SPSS program for this purpose.  If you are aware of any
>such program, please advise me.  Thanks.
>
>         By the way, Callender and Osburn's work indicates that maximized
>lambda4 is a much better estimate of a test's true reliability than is
>lambda3 (coefficient alpha).

how do we know what a test's true reliability is?



>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Karl L. Wuensch, Department of Psychology,
>East Carolina University, Greenville NC  27858-4353
>Voice:  252-328-4102     Fax:  252-328-6283
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/klw.htm
><http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/klw.htm>
>
>
>
>=================================================================
>Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
>the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
>                   http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
>=================================================================

_________________________________________________________
dennis roberts, educational psychology, penn state university
208 cedar, AC 8148632401, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://roberts.ed.psu.edu/users/droberts/drober~1.htm



=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

Reply via email to