--- Begin Message ---"Silvert, Henry" wrote:> Might I go one step further and point out the correlation does not establish > a causal relationship primarily because it does not point to directionality, > at least not without a working hypothesis and some background support. Absolutely. Without both a working hypothesis and a literature search one could say that cancer causes cigarette smoking. Stu Garfield High School Los Angeles--- End Message ---
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply causation&qu... Art Kendall
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply causation&qu... Karl L. Wuensch
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply causati... jim clark
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply cau... Karl L. Wuensch
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply causation&qu... Glen
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply causation&qu... David Duffy
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply causation&qu... EugeneGall
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply causati... EugeneGall
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply cau... Herman Rubin
- RE: Who said "Correlation does not imply causation&qu... Silvert, Henry
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply causation&qu... Stu
- Re: Who said "Correlation does not imply causati... Juha Puranen