Rich, When she says I will be removed from EDSTAT list she is practincing censorship. This kind of behind the scenes abuse happens all the time and I am sick of it. People should take responsibility for what they do. Do not attempt to subvert my pursuit of truth with private messages. I do not want to hear them. Speak out right, as men and women, not as weasels and criminals.
> > From: "E. Jacquelin Dietz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [ snip, private e-mail from Dietz; I presume that > Bill, consummate jerk that he is, has taken this > public without permission. - It annoyed me when > he did that, long ago, with mail from me.] > > > Ms Dietz, > > > > Why are you allowing them to continually insult me and to make fraudulent > > attempts to invalid CR? > > Goddam Bill, why don't you *read* ? In the stuff that you quote, > she says she is *never* going to censor for content.... > > What about insults? What about abuse? Yes Rich, what about it. Have you spoken out against anyone else in this? > Well, there is one character who spews in all directions, > at minimal instigation. He has done this, over and over, > for years. I have been abused for years and years. I first publised CR in 1986 and my discoveries have been suppressed and mischaracterized ever since. I have been lied to, cheated, and demonized. All the while, I have explained the method over and over and none of you will listen. You are so busy trying to defame my character that you will obstruct scientific progress. I will never stop until CR is disproven. The attempts made on SEMNET and on these newlists are not only incompetent but fraudlent. What is a nice way to say QUIT CHEATING!? > > There are other people who seldom say anything negative, > who only occasionally let out a snicker.... or a curse word. I wish they would just discuss the number and if they must curse then judge those who cheat and abuse. > Suppose *you* monitored a group that received a mail-list daily. > You could cut out SPAM. You could respond to complaints > from members, and cut out parts of some mail. I am not sending spam. I sending the truth and I am presenting a model that can be easily tested. > - well, if you were a truly gentle and sweet soul, you > could warn a particular jerk/ contributor that his frequent outbursts > were putting his own messages at risk. > - so don't take out your hostility on Jackie D. If a moderator wants to be given the respect of a journalist and scholar, she should abide by rules of conduct across the board. When people intentionally seek to deceive others, when they abuse other characters without provocation, and most of all, when they obstruct the pursuit of truth, she needs to give direction and show leadership. I am not some nut who is here claiming to have disproven Einstein or is in contact with aliens or anything like that. CR is a very simple math model. I have the letters of acceptance and rejection from SEM. I am not hiding anything. I just want to get a simple statistical method treated fairly. You guys can not stop your abuse long enough to just test CR. You will never beat me in a pissing contest. I had a father who taught me right from wrong. I had a mother who disapproved of brats. I have been around a lot of different kinds of people, in many countries. I had teachers who were at least sometimes smart, I read good books. I know I am not a genius but, shoot, I ain't stupid either. Pull off your dogs or the bear will hurt them. I would write and will write their bosses when I find out where they work. I am not kidding. I am not an adolescent in a pissing contest. I mean business. The fraud is going to stop or everybody in the academic world is going to know about it. I am quite prepared to be the butt of jokes and the target of psychopaths in order to reveal just how immoral things are. But I will never give into the evil that reeks through these lists. Why not just grow up and test CR fairly? Why not just comment as scientists? Jackie D has a choice. She can go to bed with these Oedipus jerks or she can call for objectivity and truth. Do not expect for me to pity her either way. She asked to be a scholar and to be taken seriously. Jackie, kick some ass. Be a doctor. Pursue the truth. Be brave. Do not be seduced by this mob. Show some leadership. Tell us, does CR work given the assumptions I have declared since 1986 and beyond? Bill > > -- > Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
