In talk.politics.drugs Erkki Komulainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In sci.stat.edu Brian Sandle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : First mistake: The Pearson product-moment correlation is not a rank > : correlation. > Spearman's rank correlation IS Pearsons PMC applied to ranks (instead of > original raw/z-scores). The above seems to stress the difference in an > odd way. How would you stress the difference and its consequences? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
