In talk.politics.drugs Szasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Sandle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> >> You use the Spearman test if you do not have scores, but if you have the >> scores, why bother with the Pearson test, because you can use the Spearman >> anyway, and if you are working by hand, it is about 1/3 the work. Why? >> More to it?
> Hopefully you're not expecting an answer from me. I'm here to chat dope policy. You maintain you have been trained in statistics and in psychology, therefore your analysis of experiments and words about dope policy based on them ought to be trusted. I maintain training to be deficient. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
