Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You wrote that you were interested in underlying assumptions; I
> think you should find that the 2x2 case offers the initial, deep
> discussions of relevant issues that won't be explicated in as much
> detail when you read about the R x K.
You are (probably) right -- quite a few concepts should generalize
pretty well. Thanks.
-Nils
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
29A, the hex of the beast:
<URL:http://www.ethicalatheist.com/docs/numbers_of_the_beast.html>
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
. http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ .
=================================================================
