Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On 06 Aug 2003 15:58:28 +0200, "Nils Chr. Framstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Is there a good (encyclopaedic) source on this, including the
> > underlying assumptions? Should cover at least the gamma, the Tau's and
> > Somers' D.
>
> Here is a review online of 2x2 tables.
>
> http://www.stir.ac.uk/staff/psychology/rrm1/conchi.html
Thanks... However I am not really interested in 2x2, but in many x
very many (possibly continuum.)
Will browse the reference list. I have Goodman & Kruskal on my desk
right now.
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
29A, the hex of the beast:
<URL:http://www.ethicalatheist.com/docs/numbers_of_the_beast.html>
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
. http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ .
=================================================================