Herman Rubin wrote:

HR wrote:
>>>I doubt that the psychologists can understand abstract
>>>reasoning, especially that it is not incremental.  The
>>>place where it is most clear is in mathematical concepts,
>>>and few outside of abstract mathematicians even see these,
>>>which can be understood without too much difficulty by
>>>children, but apparently not by those in "education".
> 
> 

TB replied:
>>I'm not quite sure what you mean, but there is a lot of research on
>>insight and intuitive problems solving and much of suggests that the
>>division between sudden and incremental solutions is rather fuzzy.
> 
> 

HR:
> It is rather difficult to check this; I do know of a 
> study by Suppes and others around 1960 on mathematical
> concept formation in children.  This involved teaching
> simple concepts, and using multiple choice tests, on
> children aged 5 to 7.  The results clearly show that
> there is only a small amount of learning before the
> concept is completely learned (no further errors); there
> is no gradual decrease in errors.
> 
> BTW, the study also checked for "transfer".  The results
> again were clear; children taught one concept took longer
> to learn a related one than those learning that as the
> initial concept, and the interference was greatest in 
> going from more special to more general.  This agrees 
> with my beliefs, and suggest that we are using the worst
> order in teaching.
> 
> We can teach concepts and formalism directly, and then 
> apply it.  The practice of "working up" to a concept is
> both time wasting and requires UNlearning, most difficult.


Is this the paper you're referring to?

P. Suppes & R. Ginsberg. (1962) Experimental studies of 
mathematical concept formation in young children. Science 
Education, 46, 230-240.

I found the reference on this website for a Patrick Suppes 
(under Papers on Psychology):

        http://www.stanford.edu/~psuppes/

It looks like an interesting paper.  But my local library's 
subscription to Science Education only goes back as far as 
January 1996.

Cheers,
Bruce
-- 
Bruce Weaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir/

.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to