Timothy W. Victor wrote:
> Bruce Weaver wrote:
> 
>> Alan Acock wrote:
>>
---- snip most of Alan's post ----

>>> SPSS is a static program that is revised every couple years with most
>>> revisions going into gee wiz graphs for marketing. It lags behind 
>>> several
>>> competitors in integrating new statistical procedures. Stata is updated
>>> monthly (command: update all) and has many powerful user contributed
>>> procedures.
>>> Alan Acock
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Alan.  Any comments on Stata's data manipulation capabilities?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bruce
> 
> 
> 
> I've been playing back and forth between SAS and Stata with respect to 
> data manipulation. Let me start with this, if you have datasets on the 
> order of several gigabytes, Stata will likely choke and die without alot 
> of extra programming tricks. This is because Stata loads the entire data 
> matrix in to memory. That being said, if you can load the matrix into 
> memory without resorting to a lot of disk caching/swaping, Stata hands 
> down wins. It took me a while to come this conclusion, only because one 
> approaches data management very differently between the packages and I 
> was thinking like a SAS user when programming Stata. Once I began to 
> think like a Stata user when using Stata the programming can much 
> easier. I tend to require a whole lot less key strokes to do the same 
> things in Stata as I do with SAS. The speed is phenomenal, the price is 
> right (perpetual license) and the customer support is without equal.
> 

Thanks for that, Timothy.  I have two further questions.

1. Can anyone comment further on Stata's shortcomings wrt 
ANOVA?

2. One of the chief complaints about SPSS is that the output 
for many procedures is unwieldy.  It often contains a lot of 
stuff that (a lot of people think) ought to be optional 
rather than automatic (e.g., multivariate results for 
repeated measures ANOVA).  And on the flip side, there are 
things that perhaps ought to be automatic that are optional 
(e.g., cell means for ANOVA models obtained via GLM).  Can 
anyone comment on how Stata's output compares to that of SPSS?

Cheers,
Bruce
-- 
Bruce Weaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir/

.
.
================================================================
This list will soon be replaced by the new list EDSTAT-L at Penn
State.  Please subscribe to the new list using the web interface
at http://lists.psu.edu/archives/edstat-l.html.
================================================================

Reply via email to