On 1/22/06, Arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I will going out with the PyGeo1.0 alpha release within the next few days. >
2nd look... (I'm watching the Canadian election results instead of programming.... boring right now, so I went back to PyGeo's site). ==== The documentation looks very complete; good from a programmer's point of view. Again, I'm looking at things quickly, but there's very little to be disappointed from, at first view. One minor nitpick: the links to the wolfram site contain, to my mind, very little material. Compared to the amount of work PyGeo must have required, I'd suggest a tiny bit more and do your own write up (with PyGeo generated pictures!) of the information that can be currently obtained from the wolfram site. Ok, enough from me for tonight! I'd encourage other people on the list to have a look at PyGeo! André _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
