Andre - I am on a short business trip so it is difficult to reply properly.
Just wanted to thank you for your work, and let you know that I find the comments quite helpful. Bottom line, I conclude that is unwise to attempt to reach out beyond the Python literate community before I can offer a more complete environment for PyGeo as part of the distribution. I think the solution will be a customized sCIte editor. I have looked at this before and it doesn't seem overly difficult to do, and a distribution of this kind seems to be within the license terms and intent of the sCIte author. And yes, I will recipricate re: rur-ple (Caught your "rant" on planetpython, btw) Art ----- Original Message ----- From: Andre Roberge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:48 pm Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Pre-announcement announcement > On 1/22/06, Arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I will going out with the PyGeo1.0 alpha release within the next > few days. > > > > 2nd look... (I'm watching the Canadian election results instead of > programming.... boring right now, so I went back to PyGeo's site). > ==== > The documentation looks very complete; good from a programmer's point > of view. Again, I'm looking at things quickly, but there's very > little to be disappointed from, at first view. > > One minor nitpick: the links to the wolfram site contain, to my mind, > very little material. Compared to the amount of work PyGeo must have > required, I'd suggest a tiny bit more and do your own write up (with > PyGeo generated pictures!) of the information that can be currently > obtained from the wolfram site. > > Ok, enough from me for tonight! I'd encourage other people on the > list to have a look at PyGeo! > > André > _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
