> I'm quoting the sensible part. > > And the part that does not belong to you, and which you are relentlessly > trying to trademark. >
Hmmm, trademark, now *there's* an idea. Python as a Calulator [tm]. But seriously, when you have a lot of Objects (like Monkeys and Dogs) and want to puppet them, by triggering methods ( mydog.bark() ), you don't want to drill down through some menus. You say I'm just pushing what'll happen by natural evolution if I just abandoned my to-your-ears arrogant tone. Just let the invisible hand do the job, so no one gets all the credit. I don't want all the credit, but I will claim a lion's share in some corners, in some niche markets where I really excel and deserve high ranking. But yes, we'll let the students decide. It's vote with your feet time. CP4E or something both dumber *and* more elitist (not a winning combo in my book). > Funny how Bucky has been accused of the same thing. > Yeah, by the same cast of wannabees. > The surrounding grandiose rhetoric is the nonsense.. > > Art Is that how you lick 'em over at MIT? I'll be quiet down now. We might lose that signal-to-noise ratio of Perfect Phi, that I try to maintain. I think I've made all the points I need to make re raw_input. End of thread, as far as me needing a soap box. I thank the Crunchy Frog for introducing us to that whole terrain. Very fertile. I learned plenty. Kirby _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig