Please provide a proposal that invalidates mine. I would be happy not to embark on the process of writing a reference implementation if someone else will so kindly solve the problem for me.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:27 [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > But we're not there yet. We're not even at the part where we can > > experiment with it, so there's really no way to know how it's going to > > go. So let's see if experimentation is worth doing to begin with. > > good. > so the committee needs to know that > there must be a less disturbing solution to the stated problem. > The motivation for the topical case-bloating is merely > an inconvenience of the try-catch > and this should be addressed... > > with some minimal alterations while reusing existing mechs. > _______________________________________________ > eeps mailing list > [email protected] > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps >
_______________________________________________ eeps mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
