On 11/28/18 21:06, Fred Hebert wrote:
you might want to look up what a "solution" is.

that's exactly what YOU ought to do.
also look up "gangrene" and "bondages"


On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:07 PM [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 11/28/18 19:10, Fred Hebert wrote:
     > Please provide a proposal that invalidates mine. I would be happy
    not to
     > embark on the process of writing a reference implementation if
    someone
     > else will so kindly solve the problem for me.

    i've told you already your problem is in the whole other realm!
    it is not about the lack of operators,
    it is that a bad-match error is not identifiable with its match expr.
    and this is what should be fixed.

    however,
    you and the commeettee are free to treat gangrene with bondages.


_______________________________________________
eeps mailing list
[email protected]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps

Reply via email to