I do question how many projects will use this. I suspect the strong reaction is an indication.
i would annotate EVERY Unbound var occurrence in my programs. because there is no simple alternative to learn this fact from a program text, except reading everything thru-n-thru.
when i add something or copypaste it is not a rare mistake to give same name to different vars. normally it produces a "bad-match" error, which semantic is grossly misleading.
The absence of this operator might make this more obvious
how does explicit annotation make anything LESS obvious? _______________________________________________ eeps mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
