El 2022-03-28 20:32, Eduardo Ochs escribió: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 at 21:44, Quiliro's lists <kil...@riseup.net> wrote: >> >> El 2022-03-28 14:20, Tomas Hlavaty escribió: >> > On Mon 28 Mar 2022 at 09:41, Quiliro's lists <kil...@riseup.net> wrote: >> >> I did not post these videos in particular with eev in mind. I just >> >> think that more works and more communication should be done in our own >> >> languages, not in a third language, unless that language is >> >> Esperanto. >> > >> > In that case, I would have never found out about eev. I cannot imagine >> > going back to living without eepitch. I am grateful to Eduardo for >> > writing about his ideas in a language I can understand (which is not his >> > own language as I understand it) and in a language, which made it more >> > likely for me to stumble upon eev (which would be less likely in the >> > other languages I more or less understand and impossible in a language I >> > do not understand). >> > >> >> Perhaps most of them would not make the effort to learn Esperanto in >> >> order to use eev. But it would be easier for them to learn Esperanto >> >> than English. So eev would be more accessible to them if it would be >> >> ported to Esperanto. >> > >> > There are other languages I need to learn. Learning Esperanto because >> > of eev is not going to happen, unfortunately. >> >> I guess my point was not understood. > > You are right - you were trying to show us a model of the human mind > in which by using languages that are not English our values would be > elevated, and that model made no sense to me... let's suppose, then, > that you did not describe it clearly enough, and that you pretended > that some parts of that model were obvious when they are not...
I guess that there is no point in explaining something to people who are not interested in such topic. Perhaps questions would show that there is interest. But I do not want to compete; just to collaborate. So if this discussion's route is competition of points of view, I am not interested in continuing. I would rather like to build on agreements. > Note that each one of us is already using at least two human languages > - Spanish/English, Portuguese/English, Hungarian (?)/English... I certainly agree on that. But that was not my point. Please read what I posted and ask. That is the best way to understand someone's point of view and value it, without even consenting. Then we can move on to collaborate!