Javier Borrajo wrote:
> It is also not realistic to expect all firewalls that must be traversed to
> support the
> latest CORBA 3.0 Firewall Specification, i.e. ports 683 + 684 for IIOP
> without/with SSL.
Thank you for proving my point. It is exactly reasoning that this that
makes us do crappy solutions like HTTP tunneling. If that was not an
option users would annoy their firewall admins so much that they would
eventually open these ports.
Right now the "least resistance" rule is applied, which in this case
means that HTTP tunneling is the norm. It sucks.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
