Hey
Javier Borrajo wrote:
> Life is hard ;-)
Indeed.
> XmlRpc is useful unless you prefer to live in the ivory tower and wait for
> all the firewall admins in the world to do the right thing.
I understand your reasoning, but unless everyone stops reasoning like
this all is lost :-(
> XmlRpc is also useful on its own merits. You may integrate VB components
> with CORBA servers buying a propietary briding product or you can use
> XmlRpc/SOAP. I prefer the latter, specially because there may not be
> a bridging product for some particular technology (ever heard of CORBA
> support for Perl? )
Yes, that would be a valid use for this kind of technology; as a bridge.
But not as a native protocol.
XML as a communication message format will most likely be used in
various B2B scenarios, and for good reasons (as a bridge!), but in my
mind including normal applicationclients to that set of valid scenarios
is wrong. It is only inefficient.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
