I haven't been following this thread too closely, but I thought I might as
well chime in with my opinion on EJB/JMS integration. What _I_ want from
EJB/JMS integration is:
1) The EJB container/server should handle incoming JMS messages, and
activate the appropriate
object.
Um... That's it, really. I'm working with a product now that claims to be
"integrated" with a certain message queueing software, but requires you to
write your own program to listen for incoming messages and pass them to your
object. I am underwhelmed with this approach.
===========================================================================
Tom Valesky -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.patriot.net/users/tvalesky
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
