"Louth, William (Exchange)" wrote:
>
> Hi Evan,
>
> I am curious why you are not curious. This seems a simple test to perform
> and the results should have been posted immediately. Bear in mind you might
> have perspective customers on this list who will view this inaction in not
> so good a light no matter what your technical/personal arguments are. Would
> you prefer that your customers to find out the hard and costly way that your
> implementation does not handle such a situation? Normally architects have
> pride in their creation and want to ensure that it meets and possibly beats
> the competition no matter how trival the match is.
It is simply a matter of priorities. Our engineering team has been extremely
busy preparing our upcoming release, and responding to issues that are brought
up on this mailing list unfortunately does not take precedence over our
internal schedule. As I said, if someone would care to send me the complete
tests, I will ensure that we get some results. I will probably get two
results (one where the component(s) use CORBA 2.2 compatible IDL with structs
and sequences and one using proper Java serialization to ensure correct
propagation of null values etc.) I am curious what score will result when
using CORBA 2.2 IDL interfaces, because that will indicate fairly well to me
how relevant this test is to effective cross-language interoperability which
is my main area of interest in this thread.
________________________________________________________________________________
Evan Ireland Sybase EAServer Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wellington, New Zealand +64 4 934-5856
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
