Check their website. They used to say pretty explicitly that they didn't
comply.
-----Original Message-----
From: Geert Mergan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Entity beans vs DAO(Data Access Objects)
> this decision. The success of Castor (an excellent pseudo-JDO
> implementation
> from the smart folks at http://www.exolab.org) and its
> integration with
> JBoss, for example, is proof that a popular user-crafted
> project can keep
> the JDO initiative alive despite J2EE political and commercial vendor
> disapproval.
Can you explain how Castor is a pseudo JDO implementation? Where does
and where doesn't it follow the official JDO spec?
geert
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
