8.1 has a much better (though still not perfect) JMS implementation.... JMSServer and JMSSession are failover-able, while JMS Destinations are still not clusterable, but at least persistent destinations are migrate-able under 8.1.
If local destinations (local queues to each cluster node) is all you require, then 8.1 is good. If you need a global or replicable queue, then use a 3rd party implementation (Fiorano, Switft, etc.), and use 8.1, which supports XA over 3rd party JMS. Supposedly 9.0 will have failover destinations, but I'll believe it when I see it. Gene --- Sachin Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to evaluate whether I should use weblogic 6.1 as against > going for 8.1 primarily because I have an application running on > weblogic 6.1 and I want to use the same for new development. > > Any suggestions on what might not work in 6.1 or wat is absolutely > essential in 8.1, > > We are using JMS extensively on our project > > > > Any thoughts will be appreciated > > > =========================================================================== > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
