Hi Eliott, The overhead of computing the doc counts is actually low, I don't think you should worry about it.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Elliott Bradshaw <ebradsh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently working on a project that visualizes geospatial data in > Elasticsearch. One of the things I am doing is generating heatmaps with > the geohash grid aggregation. I would like to take this to the extreme > case of gridding down to the individual pixel level to display raster > images of a data set, but I am not concerned with the total doc count of > each geohash. Is there a way (or could it be implemented) where an > optimized aggregation could be run that simply lists the existing terms > (geohashes) and does not bother with aggregating their counts? If this > significantly improved performance, such a feature would be very valuable. > > Thanks! > > - Elliott Bradshaw > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/834ebcb1-43b3-486d-bd1a-952005a6a66d%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/834ebcb1-43b3-486d-bd1a-952005a6a66d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Adrien Grand -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAL6Z4j45%2BgfqBk73Mfh_b6JVLcG9E7RfkE9eovPgL5kYG%3DzRug%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
