I too would like to see details of the improvement over LPan etc. I am a long
time user of SDR/computer panadapters for use in detecting very weak signals at
UHF/VHF/microwave. I use a Softrock on the K3 IF port since I got my K3 a year
ago. I have yet to see one report regarding weak sig detection with the P3
after many requests to the initial testers of the P3. ANYONE out there looking
for weak weak sigs with a P3??
73 Bill K0AWU EN37ed
---------------
> From: pmar...@yahoo.com
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:00:52 -0400
> Subject: [Elecraft] LP Pan versus P3 Panadapters
>
>
> To All,
>
> Can you please provide comments on the LP Pan versus the P3 Panadapter on the
> K3.
>
> The LP Pan seems to have a lot more features compared to the P3 and the cost
> is so much less.
>
> I understand that the LP Pan requires a PC but you get a bigger screen when
> using a PC.
>
> What makes the P3 better then the LP Pan for the K3, if it is ?
>
> Thank you
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
