Bluetooth? Oh, please Elecraft do not waste precious engineering resources on this boondoggle. If there are good reasons to stay away from a USB interface, there are infinitely more reasons to stay away from BT. You'll have all the usual driver issues and support of current and future operating systems. In addition you'll be faced with the problems intrinsic to BT, such as "pairing" of devices, endless connection delays and others. I know first-hand. Twice my company has insisted on providing BT connectivity for some of our medical devices, twice we have come up empty with good solutions.
AB2TC - Knut Tim Tucker wrote: > > BT is a great idea, but to do it right, you wouldn't want to make it > available for only mics & speakers. Once you have the BT chipset in the > K3, > there's no reason why you couldn't implement BT serial connectivity to a > notebook computer, as well. The P3 and K3 could communicate with each > other > via BT. <snip> > -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-SUB-AF-NOR-or-BALANCE-tp5631059p5640507.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
