And then there's diversity implemented at RF like all the older diversity receivers used.
In that case you cannot tell that diversity is being used, unless you have a non-diversity receiver to compare the signal with in real time. The only difference is that QSB is much reduced and, occasionally, the signal-to-noise ratio is improved using diversity. I find the big advantage of an Audio Peaking Filter is to improve the signal/noise ratio of a signal. Since it's a selective device, it may occasionally reduce QRM. Reducing QRM is seldom a significant benefit in a high-performance receiver, but can be very important in a receiver with marginal I.F. selectivity. Ron AC7AC -----Original Message----- Mike K2MK wrote: > > Diversity reception may not work for everybody. My brain can't handle it. I guess I'm the opposite. I use diversity virtually all the time on 160M-20M. Even when the rx antenna + subrx isn't necessarily making the signal more readable, I find the stereo effect very pleasing to listen to. 73, Barry N1EU -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KRX3-vs-APF-on-weak-signals-tp6577049p6 579102.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
