Concur on some of what Jim Brown said, but have ordered high quality cables from vendors that cater to commercial customers vs ham vendors. For repeaters I used RG-223 cable with N-male connectors from reputable vendors. Of course my employer paid.

I make almost all my cables as, I too, trust my own ability to chose good quality components and do quality installation. I did make up RG-58 and RG-8/x cables with crimp connectors where they were in long-term installation. For test cables or any that are subject to repeated movement my experience is the crimps eventually fail. I still like them for the convenience (in certain circumstances).

At work I mainly used BNC or N connectors. Also had TNC and mini-UHF on certain radios. Very few industrial radios use SO-239/PL-259. Mainly seen on marine radios (and CB/ham, of course). Aircraft radios use BNC a lot. TNC and sma are used quite a bit will cellular equipment.

At work I had the $500 Times Microwave crimper with multiple dies for different connectors. At home I have a $99 copy that does a fine job on RG-58 and RG-8/x (or RG-6). But I trust compression nut style connectors where I want absolute reliability.

I least like PL-259 as they are susceptible to shorting if overheated in assembly. I use a ton of adapters, though one needs to be careful with brand as not all are good. Amphenol PL-259 are what I use.

BNC is appropriate on the KX3 and other portable equipment. Understandable that SO-239 are used for amplifiers, etc. This topic is kind of no issue to me? If you were dealing with 50 contact connectors I might agree.

73, Ed - KL7UW

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to